Trail Center logo
Contents

Theme: Giving Back to the Parks

The Edgewood Preserve Docent Training Program

Docents: Sharing Nature with the Bay Area Community

Meeting the Land at Fairfield Osborne Preserve


Other Features

A Brief History of Bay Area Parks and Open Space
   Pt. 2: From the 1960s through the Present Day


Names on the Land
   Pt. 2, Santa Cruz County


Education Stations "Smooth" the Trails

"Dish" Argument Continues on New Terrain

Sudden Oak Death: New Victims


Departments

Letter from the Trail Center

Park News

Trail Center Notes

Upcoming Events

The Trail Companion

Winter 2001

A Brief History of Bay Area Parks and Open Spaces
Part 2. From the 1960s through the Present Day

      ...continued.

Extending the Regional Park System

Regional park districts continued to expand. East Contra Costa County joined the East Bay Regional Park District in 1981, as did the Livermore area in 1992, bringing almost the entire East Bay under its jurisdiction. Its holdings have increased to encompass 59 regional parks, recreation areas, wilderness, shorelines, preserves and land bank areas, together covering more than 90,000 acres, over 50,500 of them in Alameda County and nearly 40,500 in Contra Costa County.
      The 1990s were also years of growth for the Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District. In 1992 it annexed a small portion of Santa Cruz County, and in spring of 1997 it received requests from the Half Moon Bay City Council, the Pescadero Municipal Advisory Council, the MidCoast Community Council, and the Coastal Alliance, to explore ways of conserving the resources of the San Mateo County coast. In November of 1998 coastside voters passed an advisory measure favoring annexation to the district, which has since been working toward that goal. As of the year 2000, the Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District had preserved over 45,000 acres of diverse open space and was managing twenty-four open space preserves.

Saving Farmlands

The 1980s brought the issue of disappearing farmland back to the fore. Apprehension was such in Napa County that its voters passed a slow growth measure there in 1980. In July of the same year the Marin Agricultural Land Trust was incorporated to restrict the development of farmland by acquiring the development rights from the farmers. Its program was successful enough that less than three years later the Marin County Open Space District dedicated ten percent of its acquisition funds to the land trust for the purchase of agricultural easements. People for Open Space weighed in on the problem with two important reports - "Endangered Harvest : the Future of Bay Area Farmlands" in fall, 1980, the first comprehensive report on agricultural problems in the Bay Area, and "Room Enough : Housing and Open Space in the Bay Area" in fall of 1983, which addressed concerns that saving farmland might conflict with providing adequate housing. In 1984 the organization backed an initiative in Solano County requiring the county board of supervisors to abide by the county plan adopted in 1980. The measure passed, halting development of a proposed new town near Vacaville.

The Present and Future

From 1993 to 2001 the Clinton presidency reversed federal hostility to environmental preservation, though it was also criticized for advancing conservation by fiat rather than negotiation and excluding local voices from the process. At the same time, new prosperity and the takeoff of the computer industry brought unprecedented new environmental pressures to bear on the Bay Area. Skyrocketing property values made purchase of land for open space more difficult. The increasing lack of affordable housing weakened resistance to new development, though there is little likelihood that any new housing approved will be any more "affordable." The cost of living forced long-term residents who formed the base of the conservation movement out of the region, leaving their work a legacy for newly wealthy newcomers whose interest in continuing the task is yet to be determined. The outmigration has also brought new pressures to bear on agricultural areas of the Central Valley and forest lands of the Sierra foothills.
      Much has been accomplished over the past century to keep our natural areas natural, protect their beauty, plants and animals, and provide for the enjoyment of all. The question now is whether we can retain what we have achieved.

<== Back 5 of 7 Next ==>